[Fwd: Call for Microhistory Papers ACTR Panel]

[Luella Massey]

Please forward to any and all individuals and lists:

CALL FOR PAPERS
FOR A PANEL AT THE ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF
THE ASSOCIATION FOR CANADIAN THEATRE RESEARCH
YORK UNIVERSITY MAY 27 TO 30, 2006
 
*A Tyranny of Documents:**  **The Theatre Historian as Film Noir Detective*
 
Proposals are invited that examine one document--and one only--that has 
been particularly troublesome to the researcher.  The emphasis should be 
on the work of the historian as detective in the archive, and on the 
difficult balance sought between respect for documentary evidence, the 
need to generate significance from it, and the natural-but-dangerous 
tendency to smooth out the rough edges of evidence. 
 
This call is looking for *ten-minute* explorations of one document along 
*'microhistorical' *lines (outlined below), for a larger number of 
panelists than usual in a ninety-minute session.  It welcomes proposals 
from scholars early in their careers, and from seasoned veterans; the 
area of research is not restricted.  Please send proposals of no more 
than 250 words, along with a brief biography, to Stephen Johnson at the 
University of Toronto (stephen.johnson at utoronto.ca 
<mailto:stephen.johnson at utoronto.ca>).  Copy in the body of the email, 
please.
 
Deadline for submission is March 1.  The organizer welcomes questions in 
advance of submitting a proposal.  Please be aware that ACTR members may 
only present one paper at the annual conference; this call is intended 
for those not otherwise engaged.
 
*Premise of the Panel--Microhistory:**  ***
The problems and pitfalls of writing theatre history in the 21st century 
were usefully discussed by Tom Postlewait in 'Writing History Today' 
(/Theatre Survey/ Nov 2000); he suggests that practitioners of theatre 
history look closely at the 'microhistorical' direction in historical 
research, as particularly well-suited to the discipline.  Microhistory 
tends toward the micro-scopic examination of the individual event and 
document, in an effort to tease out of minimum evidence a complex set of 
relationships; in his phrase, this is history 'in the Chekhovian mode.'  
More particularly, microhistory values what its practitioners call the 
'opaque document' or 'the exceptional normal'--in fact, suggesting that 
the most irritating documents are the most valuable precisely because 
they are 'opaque.'  It is the joke we don't 'get' that exposes the 
cracks in our own preconceptions of a society; our effort to understand 
it, with any luck, enriches our understanding. 
 
This is all well and good; but theatre historians are particularly 
inclined by necessity to make much of little, and there are dangers.  
The documentary evidence--in particular for such an ephemeral art as 
theatre--can be so 'opaque' as to be incomprehensible, and the patterns 
among them so apparently arbitrary that there can be no resolution.  
Microhistory may favour the ironic-but-humanistic mode of Chekhov, but 
in our darker moments in the archive, this gives way to Beckett, and 
interpretation fails.
 
If the historian is a detective, the model is, sometimes, less Hercule 
Poirot than Mike Hammer in the film /Kiss Me, Deadly/--who can’t begin 
to realize the implications of the mystery he’s trying to solve, but who 
can’t stop himself from following the clues.
 
See Postlewait's article for reference (available on line).  Also 'On 
Microhistory,' by Giovanni Levi, in /New Perspectives on Historical 
Writing/, ed. Peter Burke (Polity 91), 93-113; and the very useful 
'Microhistory: Two or Three Things I Know About It,' by Carlo Ginzburg 
(/Critical Inquiry/ 20:1 Autumn 93), 10-35 (available on line).
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://artsservices.uwaterloo.ca/pipermail/candrama/attachments/20060203/6d1627dd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ACTR PANEL CALL FOR PAPERS.doc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 28672 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://artsservices.uwaterloo.ca/pipermail/candrama/attachments/20060203/6d1627dd/attachment.obj>