From andrea.charette at uwaterloo.ca  Mon Mar  2 13:25:24 2026
From: andrea.charette at uwaterloo.ca (Andrea Charette)
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 18:25:24 +0000
Subject: [Dirscch] 1:30 - agenda for today and draft of Call for Nominations
In-Reply-To: <YT1PR01MB92093A57BCCE98B8FABC7C649172A@YT1PR01MB9209.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <YT1PR01MB92093A57BCCE98B8FABC7C649172A@YT1PR01MB9209.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Message-ID: <YT1PR01MB920952C1ADE8A28C7EBE7563917EA@YT1PR01MB9209.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Hello,

I hope to record today's meeting to assist with recall of discussions and decisions, follow-up, and action items.

The suggested agenda for today:


  1.
review Survey Responses (45 minutes)
  2.
5 minute break, read draft of Call for Nominations
  3.
review Selection Process for clarity
  4.
finalize Call for Nominations

Best,

Andrea



Andrea Charette
Director of Faculty Relations and Planning

Faculty of Arts<https://uwaterloo.ca/arts/>

University of Waterloo
519.888.4567 X42218



________________________________
From: Andrea Charette <andrea.charette at uwaterloo.ca>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2026 4:50 PM
To: dirscch at artsservices.uwaterloo.ca <dirscch at artsservices.uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: Survey responses shared

Hi everyone,

The Survey Responses folder now contains reports for each of the survey's 9 questions.
​​[https://res.public.onecdn.static.microsoft/assets/fluentui-resources/1.1.0/app-min/assets/item-types/24_1.5x/folder.png]Survey Responses<https://uofwaterloo.sharepoint.com/:f:/r/sites/tm-arts-deanofartsoffice-FacultyRelations/Shared%20Documents/Faculty%20Relations/Director%20Nominating%20Committees/School%20of%20CCH/Survey%20Responses?csf=1&web=1>​​

If you have any difficulty accessing the folder or documents, please let me know.


Andrea



Andrea Charette
Director of Faculty Relations and Planning

Faculty of Arts<https://uwaterloo.ca/arts/>

University of Waterloo
519.888.4567 X42218


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://artsservices.uwaterloo.ca/pipermail/dirscch/attachments/20260302/a40e906a/attachment.htm>

From andrea.charette at uwaterloo.ca  Mon Mar  2 23:33:16 2026
From: andrea.charette at uwaterloo.ca (Andrea Charette)
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 04:33:16 +0000
Subject: [Dirscch] a thought about shortlisting nominees for interviews
Message-ID: <YT1PR01MB9209AF0B1D19616F670FFDD2917FA@YT1PR01MB9209.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

We'll definitely need a rubric to assist us in assessing candidates after we've had the chance to interview them.

But I can't wrap my head around a rubric we would use to help identify which nominees to shortlist for interview in the first place.  We will know so little about them from just the nomination (even with a 600-word statement!).

I suspect we might not have a large number of faculty knocking down the door for this opportunity.  What if we required nominations to be submitted with a minimum number of supporters, then committed to offering an interview to all nominees?   I am not concerned that the number would be too great.....

Thoughts?


Andrea



Andrea Charette
Director of Faculty Relations and Planning

Faculty of Arts<https://uwaterloo.ca/arts/>

University of Waterloo
519.888.4567 X42218


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://artsservices.uwaterloo.ca/pipermail/dirscch/attachments/20260303/72df86bd/attachment-0001.htm>